Ensuring the Validity of Methodical Support for Managing Electric Power System Components

  • El’mar M. FARKHADZADE
  • Audin Z. MURADALIYEV
  • Tamara K. RAFIYEVA
  • Aisel’ AliPanach kyzy RUSTAMOVA
Keywords: electric system, management, statistical data, maintenance, methodical recommendations

Abstract

Enhancing the validity of methodical recommendations is one of the main problems that have to be solved in developing intelligent systems for managing maintenance and repair of electric power system equipment and devices. A risk of making an erroneous decision exists mainly due to availability of gross errors and abnormal values in statistical data on operation. The difficulty of solving this problem becomes still more obvious obvious if this risk is taken together with the fact that non-random samples of statistical data on operation differ from the theoretical representative samples of random quantities from the general totality of data, the need to consider a multidimensional nature of statistical data on operation, and lack of methods for analyzing scanty samples of multidimensional data. A method that allows abnormal realizations to be revealed based on the fiducial approach and statistical hypothesis testing theory is developed. By applying express methods for calculating the fiducial interval critical values for the selected significance level, this problem can be solved without using special tables and a computer.

Author Biographies

El’mar M. FARKHADZADE

FARKHADZADE El’mar M. (Azerbaijan Scientific Research and Design Prospecting Institute of Energetic (ASRDPIE), Baku, Azerbaijan) — Senior scientific researcher, Dr. Sci. (Eng.)

Audin Z. MURADALIYEV

MURADALIYEV Audin Z. (ASRDPIE, Baku, Azerbaijan) — Head of the Department, Dr. Sci. (Eng.)

Tamara K. RAFIYEVA

RAFIYEVA Tamara K. (ASRDPIE, Baku, Azerbaijan) — Senior scientific researcher, Cand. Sci. (Eng.)

Aisel’ AliPanach kyzy RUSTAMOVA

RUSTAMOVA Aisel’ AliPanach kyzy (ASRDPIE, Baku, Azerbaijan) — Leading Engineer

References

1. Воропай Н.И., Стычинский З.А. Интеллектуальная энергосистема для энергетически эффективной электроэнергетики будущего. — Вестник ИрГТУ, № 12(59), с. 216—219.

2. Фархадзаде Э.М., Мурадалиев А.З., Фарзалиев Ю.З., Исмаилова С.М. Система управления безопасностью и безошибочностью базы данных. — Энергетик, 2008, № 3, с. 33—35.

3. Попукайло В.С. Исследование критериев грубых ошибок применительно к выборкам малого объема. — Радио, электро и компьютерные системы, 2013, № 3(20), с. 39—44.

4. Третьяк Л.Н. Обработка результатов наблюдений. Учеб­ное пос. Оренбург, ГОУ, 2004, 141 с.

5. Руди Д.Ю., Попова М.В., Петров С.И. Грубые погрешности и критерии их исключения. Эффективное и качественное снабжение и использование электроэнергии. Сб. докладов 5-й Международ. научно-практ. конф. в рамках специализированного форума «Expo Build Russia». Екатеринбург: Изд-во УМЦ УПИ, 2016, с. 179-181.

6. Гнеденко Б.В., Беляев Ю.К., Соловьев А.Д. Математические методы в теории надежности. М., Наука, 1965, 524 с.

7. Фархадзаде Э.М., Мурадалиев А.З., Фарзалиев Ю.З. Точность показателей индивидуальной надежности энергоблоков и выбор критериев. — Известия НАН Азербайджана. Серия физико-технических и математических наук, 2006, том XXVI, № 3, с. 44—48.

8. Farhadzadeh E.M., Muradaliyev A.Z., Abdullayeva S.A. Criteria the estimation expediency of classification information on reliability of the equipment and devices EPS. Journal: «Reliability: Theory&Applications» (USA), 2016, June, vol.10, No 2(41), p. 42—47.
#
1. Voropai N.I., Stychinsky Z.A. Vestnik Irkutskogo Gosudarstvennogo Technicheskogo Universiteta — in Russ. (Bulletin of the Irkutsk State Technical University), No. 12(59), pp. 216—219.

2. Farkhadzade E.M., Muradaliyev A.Z., Farzaliyev Yu.Z., Ismailova S.M. Energetik — in Russ. (Power Engineering Specialist), 2008, No. 3, pp. 33-35.

3. Popukailo V.S. Radio, elektro i kompyuternyye sistemy — in Russ. (Radio, electro and computer systems), 2013, No. 3(20), pp. 39-44.

4. Tret’yak L.N. Obrabotka resul’tatov nabludenii: uchebnoye pos. (Treatment of results of supervisions: educational supplies). Orenburg, GOU, 2004, 141 p.

5. Rudi D.Yu., Popova M.V., Petrov S.I. Sbornik dokladov 5-i Mezhdunarod. konf.... (Proc. of 5th Intern. konf. ...). Yekaterinburg, Publ. UMTs UPI, 2016, pp. 179-181.

6. Gnedenko B.V., Belyayev Yu.K., Solov’yev A.D. Matematicheskiye metody v teorii nadezhnosti (Mathematical methods are in the theory of reliability). Moscow, Nauka, 1965, 524 р.

7. Farkhadzade E.M., Muradaliyev A.Z., Farzaliyev Yu.Z. Izvestiya Natsional’noi Akademii nauk Azerbaijana. Seriya fiziko-tekh. i mat. nauk — in Russ. (News of National Akademy of sciences of Azerbaijan. Series of physical-technical and mathematical sciences), 2006, vol. XXVI, No. 3, pp. 44-48.

8. Farhadzadeh E.M., Muradaliyev A.Z., Abdullayeva S.A. Criteria the estimation expediency of classification information on reliability of the equipment and devices EPS. Journal: «Reliability: Theory&Applications» (USA), 2016, June, vol.10, No 2(41), p. 42-47.
Published
2019-07-15
Section
Article