Factors Causing Unreliable Accounting of Electricity Consumption on the Electrified Transport “Two Wires-Rail” Longitudinal Power Supply Lines
Abstract
As is known, the “two wires–rail” power supply system (TWR line) does not meet the modern electromagnetic compatibility requirements, which is a factor causing increased damageability of alarming, centralized control and interlocking devices, as well as other non-traction electric power consumers. In addition, there often occur unexplained differences (unbalance) in the accounting of electricity received by end users and consumed by the TWR line at a traction substation. The accomplished studies have shown that in almost all sections of the network, the actual electricity consumption is significantly lower than that recorded by the TWR line metering devices. The discrepancy in the readings could be explained by unauthorized taps of electricity. However, such a statement will be superficial. The article considers the real factors causing the unbalance in accounting the electricity consumed on the TWR line, which are explained by the magnetic influence of the contact system. An equivalent circuit of the contact system magnetic influence on the TWR line is presented for any configuration of the section with different placements of self-contained transformer substations at different levels of their power capacity. The magnetic influence of the contact system on the TWR line is illustrated by a phasor diagram.
References
2. Бессонов Л.А. Теоретические основы электротехники. Электрические цепи. М.: Юрайт, 2016, 701 с.
3. Бадёр М.П. Электромагнитная совместимость. М.: УМК МПС РФ, 2002, 637 с.
4. Шарандин А.А. Наведенное напряжение и защита от него. М.: НТФ Энергопрогресс, 2016, 40 с.
5. Зевеке Г.В. и др. Основы теории цепей. М.: Энергоатомиздат, 1989, 528 с.
6. Пат. RU 2286891C1. Высоковольтная проводная система продольного электроснабжения, совместимая с электромагнитным полем контактной сети электрических железных дорог, электрифицированных на переменном токе / М.П. Бадёр, Е.Ю. Семенова, Д.В. Ермоленко и др., 2006.
7. Косарев А.Б. Основы теории электромагнитной совместимости. М.: Интекс, 2004, 272 с.
8. Ульянов С.А. Электромагнитные переходные процессы в электрических системах. М.: Энергия, 1970, 528 с.
9. Ратнер М.П., Могилевский Е.Л. Электроснабжение нетяговых потребителей железных дорог. М.: Транспорт, 1985, 295 с.
10. Караев Р.И, Волобринский С.Д., Ковалев И.Н. Электрические сети и энергосистемы. М.: Транспорт,1988, 326 с.
11. Евдокунин Г.А., Грудилин С.В., Корепанов А.А. Выбор способа заземления нейтрали в сетях 6–10 кВ. – Электричество, 1998, № 12, с. 8–22.
12. Кужеков С.Л., Гончаров С.В. Практическое пособие по электрическим сетям и электрооборудованию. Ростов н/Д: Феникс, 2010, 492 с.
13. Быстрицкий Г.Ф., Кудрин Б.И. Электроснабжение. Силовые трансформаторы. М.: Юрайт, 2018, 201 с.
14. Bustamante S., Manana M., Arroyo A., et al. Dissolved Gas Analysis Equipment for Online Monitoring of Transformer Oil: A Review. – Sensors, 2019, 19(19):4057, DOI:10.3390/s19194057.
15. Фремке А.В., Душин Е.М. Электрические измерения. Л.: Энергия,1980, 392 c..
#
1. Markvardt К.G. Elektrosnabzhenie elektrifitsirovannyh zhelez-nyh dorog (Electricity Supply for Electrified Railways). М.: Transport, 1982, 463 p.
2. Bessonov L.А. Teoreticheskie osnovy elektrotekhniki. Elektricheskie tsepi (Theoretical Foundations of Electrical Engineering. Electrical Circuits). М.: Yurayt, 2016, 701 p.
3. Bader M.P. Elektromagnitnaya sovmestimost' (Electromagnetic Compatibility). М.: UMK MPS PF, 2002, 637 p.
4. Sharandin А.А. Navedennoe napryazhenie i zashchita ot nego (Induced Voltage and Protection Against It). М.: NТF Enеrgoprogress, 2016, 40 p.
5. Zeveke G.V., et al. Osnovy teorii tsepey (Fundamentals of circuit theory). M.: Energoatomizdat, 1989, 528 p.
6. Pat. RU 2286891C1. Vysokovol'tnaya provodnaya sistema prodol'nogo elektrosnabzheniya, sovmestimaya s elektromagnitnym polem kontaktnoy seti elektricheskih zheleznyh dorog, elektrifitsirovannyh na peremennom toke (High-Voltage Wire Longitudinal Power Supply System, Compatible with the Electromagnetic Field of the Contact Network of Electric Railways Electrified with Alternating Current) / M.P. Bader, E.Yu. Semenova, D.V. Ermolenko, et al, 2006.
7. Kosarev A.B. Osnovy teorii elektromagnitnoy sovmestimosti (Foundations of the Theory of Electro-magnetic Compatibility). М.: Inteks, 2004, 272 p.
8. Ul'yanov S.А. Elektromagnitnye perekhodnye protsessy v elektricheskih sistemah (Electromagnetic Transients in Electrical Systems). М.: Energiya, 1970, 528 p.
9. Ratner M.P., Mogilevsky E.L. Elektrosnabzhenie netyagovyh potrebiteley zheleznyh dorog (Electricity Supply to Non-Traction Consumers of Railways). M.: Transport, 1985, 295 p.
10. Karaev R.I., Volobrinsky S.D., Kovalev I.N. Elektricheskie seti i energosistemy (Electrical networks and power systems). M.: Transport, 1988, 326 p.
11. Evdokunin G.A., Grudilin S.V., Korepanov A.A. Elektrichestvo – in Russ. (Electricity), 1998, No. 12, pp. 8–22.
12. Kuzhekov S.L., Goncharov S.V. Prakticheskoe posobie po elektricheskim setyam i elektrooborudovaniyu (A Practical Guide to Electrical Networks and Electrical Equipment). Rostov n/D: Feniks, 2010, 492 p.
13. Bystritsky G.F., Kudrin B.I. Elektrosnabzhenie. Silovye transformatory (Power Supply. Power Transformers). М.: Yurayt, 2018, 201 p.
14. Bustamante S., Manana M., Arroyo A., et al. Dissolved Gas Analysis Equipment for Online Monitoring of Transformer Oil: A Review. – Sensors, 2019, 19(19):4057, DOI:10.3390/s19194057.
15. Fremke А.V., Dushin Е.М. Elektricheskie izmereniya (Electrical measurements). L.: Energiya,1980, 392 p.
