A Search for the Power System Stability Limit at a Specified Controlled Cutset by Applying a Flow Model
Abstract
Currently, static aperiodic stability in the power system within operational dispatch control is maintained by monitoring active power flows through controlled cutsets. According to the existing regulatory and technical documentation, the search for the maximum flow based on the static aperiodic stability criterion must be carried out by aggravating the operation mode in a specified loading direction. For a large power system, there are many different operation mode aggravation trajectories, and the corresponding maximum flows through the cutset can vary significantly. To ensure static stability, it is necessary to consider at least three different aggravation trajectories and select the one that results in the lowest maximum active power flow through the cutset. Thus, the search for the maximum flow is an empirical search problem. The article proposes a method for determining the maximum flow in terms of static aperiodic stability through a controlled cutset using a nonlinear programming method without the need to enumerate different loading trajectories. A flow model is used as the equations describing the steady-state mode to improve the numerical performance of the method. Techniques using which the numerical performance of the proposed method can be improved are considered. Numerical experiments demonstrating the capacities of the proposed method are carried out.
References
2. СТО 59012820.27.010.004-2020. Правила определения максимально допустимых и аварийно допустимых перетоков активной мощности в контролируемых сечениях, а также допустимых перетоков активной мощности в контролируемых сечениях при работе в вынужденном режиме. Стандарт организации АО «СО ЕЭС», 2020, 25 с.
3. Крюков А.В. Предельные режимы электроэнергетических систем. Иркутск: Иркутский государственный университет путей сообщения, 2012, 236 с.
4. Аюев Б.И., Давыдов В.В., Ерохин П.М. Оптимизационные вычислительные модели предельных режимов электрических систем для заданного направления утяжеления. – Электричество, 2010, № 12, с. 2–7.
5. Аюев Б.И., Давыдов В.В., Ерохин П.М. Оптимизационные модели ближайших предельных режимов электрических систем. – Электричество, 2011, № 3, с. 1–9.
6. Давыдов В.В. и др. Исследование позиционной модели энергетической системы. – Электричество, 2019, № 3, с. 4–14.
7. Ayuev B.I., Davydov V.V., Erokhin P.M. Models of Closest Marginal States of Power Systems in p-Norms. – IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2018, 33(2), pp. 1195–1208, DOI: 10.1109/TPWRS.2017.2719125.
8. Идельчик В.И. Расчёты установившихся режимов электрических систем. M: Энергия, 1977, 189 с.
9. Гаврилова А.Е., Банных П.Ю., Паздерин А.В. Применение критерия опасного сечения в алгоритме поиска предельного режима в заданном сечении. – Электроэнергетика глазами молодежи, 2023, т. 1. с. 40–43.
10. Давыдов В.В. и др. Вычислительные модели потокораспределения в электрических системах. М.: Флинта: Наука, 2008, 256 с.
11. Bannykh P. et al. Distribution Grid Power Flow Algorithm Based on Power-Energy Flow Model. – 2018 IEEE 59th International Scientific Conference on Power and Electrical Engineering of Riga Technical University (RTUCON), 2018, DOI: 10.1109/RTUCON. 2018.8659860.
12. Паздерин А.В. и др. Гибридная трехфазно-однолинейная режимная модель для оценки состояния электроэнергетической системы. – Электричество, 2019, № 3, с. 15–23.
13. Неуймин В.Г. и др. Использование оптимизационных методов внутренней точки для оценивания состояния энергосистем. – Известия НТЦ Единой Энергетической Системы, 2012, № 1(66), с. 39–45.
#
1. Prikaz Ministerstva energetiki Rossiyskoy Federatsii (Order of the Ministry of Energy of the Russian Federation) No. 630 dated 03.08.2018.
2. STO 59012820.27.010.004-2020. Pravila opredeleniya mak-simal’no dopustimyh i avariyno dopustimyh peretokov aktivnoy moshchnosti v kontroliruemyh secheniyah, a takzhe dopustimyh peretokov aktivnoy moshchnosti v kontroliruemyh secheniyah pri rabote v vynuzhdennom rezhime. Standart organizatsii AO «SO EES» (Rules for Determining the Maximum Permissible and Emergency Permissible Overflows of Active Power in Controlled Sections, as Well as Permissible Overflows of Active Power in Controlled Sections when Operating in Forced Mode. The Standard of the Organization of JSC "SO UES"), 2020, 25 p.
3. Kryukov A.V. Predel’nye rezhimy elektroenergeticheskih sistem (Limit Modes of Electric Power Systems). Irkutsk: Irkutskiy gosudarst-vennyy universitet putey soobshcheniya, 2012, 236 p.
4. Ayuev B.I., Davydov V.V., Erohin P.M. Elektrichestvo – in Russ. (Electricity), 2010, No. 12, pp. 2–7.
5. Ayuev B.I., Davydov V.V., Erohin P.M. Elektrichestvo – in Russ. (Electricity), 2011, No. 3, pp. 1–9.
6. Davydov V.V. et al. Elektrichestvo – in Russ. (Electricity), 2019, No. 3, pp. 4–14.
7. Ayuev B.I., Davydov V.V., Erokhin P.M. Models of Closest Marginal States of Power Systems in p-Norms. – IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2018, 33(2), pp. 1195–1208, DOI: 10.1109/TPWRS. 2017.2719125.
8. Idel’chik V.I. Raschyoty ustanovivshihsya rezhimov elektri-cheskih sistem (Calculations of Steady-State Modes of Electrical Systems). M: Energiya, 1977, 189 p.
9. Gavrilova A.E., Bannyh P.Yu., Pazderin A.V. Elektroenergetika glazami molodezhi – in Russ. (Electric Power Industry Through the Eyes of Youth), 2023, vol. 1. pp. 40–43.
10. Davydov V.V. et al. Vychislitel’nye modeli potokoraspredeleniya v elektricheskih sistemah (Computational Models of Flow Distribution in Electrical Systems). M.: Flinta: Nauka, 2008, 256 p.
11. Bannykh P. et al. Distribution Grid Power Flow Algorithm Based on Power-Energy Flow Model. – 2018 IEEE 59th International Scientific Conference on Power and Electrical Engineering of Riga Technical University (RTUCON), 2018, DOI: 10.1109/RTUCON.2018.8659860.
12. Pazderin A.V. et al. Elektrichestvo – in Russ. (Electricity), 2019, No. 3, pp. 15–23.
13. Neuymin V.G. et al. Izvestiya NTTs Edinoy Energeticheskoy Sistemy – in Russ. (Proceedings of the Scientific and Technical Center of the Unified Energy System), 2012, No. 1(66), pp. 39–45.
